FLO Home vs ChargePoint CPH50
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either charger; price, app quality, warranty and build quality are not covered.
- Power: both are rated 12 kW (50 A), so charging speed is the same on paper.
- Standby: the FLO Home draws less with no car connected (2.69 vs 2.93 W), at most about $0.38/yr less (estimate).
- Reach: the FLO Home has the longer listed cord (25 vs 18 ft).
| FLO Home | ChargePoint CPH50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max output | 12 kW | 12 kW |
| Max current | 50 A | 50 A |
| Typical breaker (est.) | 70 A | 70 A |
| Type | Level 2 | Level 2 |
| Outputs | 1 | 1 |
| Cord length | 25 ft | 18 ft |
| Cord gauge | 8 | 9 |
| Network | Yes | Yes |
| Protocol | Wi-Fi or Gigabit Ethernet | Wi-Fi or Gigabit Ethernet |
| Standby (no vehicle) | 2.69 W | 2.93 W |
| Idle (car connected) | 5.87 W | 6.67 W |
| Loss at full current | 160.62 W | 185.53 W |
| Max standby cost/yr (est.) | $4.31 | $4.70 |
| Features | — | None |
| Certified | 2024-06-24 | 2023-10-04 |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 3543898 | ENERGY STAR record 2683979 |
Prices are not in ENERGY STAR data (data gap). Open this pair in the compare tool
See FLO EV chargers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See ChargePoint EV chargers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)