ChargePoint CPH50 vs Grizzl-E Smart
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either charger; price, app quality, warranty and build quality are not covered.
- Power: the ChargePoint CPH50 is rated higher (12 vs 9.6 kW), about 8 more miles of range per hour for a car using 30 kWh/100 mi, if the car can accept it. It also needs a bigger circuit (70 A vs 50 A breaker, est.).
- Standby: the Grizzl-E Smart draws less with no car connected (2.33 vs 2.93 W), at most about $0.96/yr less (estimate).
- Reach: the Grizzl-E Smart has the longer listed cord (24 vs 18 ft).
| ChargePoint CPH50 | Grizzl-E Smart | |
|---|---|---|
| Max output | 12 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Max current | 50 A | 40 A |
| Typical breaker (est.) | 70 A | 50 A |
| Type | Level 2 | Level 2 |
| Outputs | 1 | 1 |
| Cord length | 18 ft | 24 ft |
| Cord gauge | 9 | 8 |
| Network | Yes | Yes |
| Protocol | Wi-Fi or Gigabit Ethernet | Wi-Fi or Gigabit Ethernet |
| Standby (no vehicle) | 2.93 W | 2.33 W |
| Idle (car connected) | 6.67 W | 5.2 W |
| Loss at full current | 185.53 W | 91.99 W |
| Max standby cost/yr (est.) | $4.70 | $3.74 |
| Features | None | — |
| Certified | 2023-10-04 | 2024-08-06 |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 2683979 | ENERGY STAR record 2378449 |
Prices are not in ENERGY STAR data (data gap). Open this pair in the compare tool
See ChargePoint EV chargers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See Grizzl-E EV chargers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)