Blink HQ200 vs ChargePoint CPH50
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either charger; price, app quality, warranty and build quality are not covered.
- Power: both are rated 12 kW (50 A), so charging speed is the same on paper.
- Standby: the Blink HQ200 draws less with no car connected (0.96 vs 2.93 W), at most about $3.16/yr less (estimate).
- Reach: the Blink HQ200 has the longer listed cord (23 vs 18 ft).
- Connectivity: only the ChargePoint CPH50 is listed as network-capable (Wi-Fi/app, scheduling, utility programs).
| Blink HQ200 | ChargePoint CPH50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max output | 12 kW | 12 kW |
| Max current | 50 A | 50 A |
| Typical breaker (est.) | 70 A | 70 A |
| Type | Level 2 | Level 2 |
| Outputs | 1 | 1 |
| Cord length | 23 ft | 18 ft |
| Cord gauge | 6 | 9 |
| Network | No | Yes |
| Protocol | None | Wi-Fi or Gigabit Ethernet |
| Standby (no vehicle) | 0.96 W | 2.93 W |
| Idle (car connected) | 2.03 W | 6.67 W |
| Loss at full current | 122.92 W | 185.53 W |
| Max standby cost/yr (est.) | $1.54 | $4.70 |
| Features | — | None |
| Certified | 2022-06-06 | 2023-10-04 |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 2397473 | ENERGY STAR record 2683979 |
Prices are not in ENERGY STAR data (data gap). Open this pair in the compare tool
See Blink EV chargers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See ChargePoint EV chargers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)